Legal Opinion

Roberts Real Estate, Inc. v. New York State Department of State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 31, 1991PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Mikoll, J.

Respondent charged petitioners with failure to supervise the real estate business of petitioner Roberts Real Estate, Inc. (hereinafter Roberts, Inc.) or the sales activities of Lucia DeDe and Karen Curren. Petitioners were also charged with untrustworthiness and incompetence under Real Property Law § 441-c (1) for failing to disclose to various purchasers of land in a development in the Town of New Scotland, Albany County, that their water supply was possibly contaminated with methane gas.

The charges arose as a consequence of the alleged misconduct of Curren in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. 300 Gramatan Avenue Associates v. State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Sperte v. ShafferAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  3. Geisler v. Department of StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  4. Friedman v. PatersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  5. Friedman v. PatersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Roberts Real Estate, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Bell v. Department of StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  3. Matter of Malul v. New York Dept. of StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API