Legal Opinion

Wall v. Spurlock

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 17, 1952No. 33724Published

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.

All that is required of a plaintiff is to plainly, fully and distinctly allege the facts, on which he bases his right to recover against the defendants, setting the same forth in an orderly manner with the paragraphs numbered consecutively. He is not required in the interest of good pleading to go into detail and to minutely specify and set out in his petition the evidence on which he relies to make out his case. A petition which is in compliance with this broad rule, if it alleges facts which authorize a recovery by the plaintiff against the defendants, is sufficient to withstand a general…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Brantley v. Rhodes-Haverty Furniture Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  2. Grist v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1914
  3. Georgia-Alabama Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
  4. Farrar v. BrackettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1890
  5. Peppas v. MilesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API