Dziedzic v. Kelly
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Petitioner’s primary argument on appeal is that his Tier III hearing was not commenced in a timely fashion. We find that since the seven-day period for commencing petitioner’s hearing (7 NYCRR 251-5.1 [a]) ended on Veterans’ Day, a public holiday, respondent’s request for an extension of time and the commencement of the hearing on the next succeeding business day was timely (see, General Construction Law § 25-a [1]; cf., People ex rel. Frost v Meloni, 124 AD2d 1032, lv denied 69 NY2d 606; Matter of Picciano v Hammock, 92 AD2d 1043, 1044, lv denied 59…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- MATTER OF COLEMAN v. KellyNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Coleman v. KellyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Picciano v. HammockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- People ex rel. Frost v. MeloniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
3Cited by2 opinions
- Persing v. CoughlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Maldonado v. CoughlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989