Legal Opinion

Jones v. Markley Et Ux.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 10, 1927No. Appeal 74PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Henderson, J.,

The plaintiff’s action was brought against Harry W. Markley and Anna L. Markley, his wife, for money loaned to the latter. It is not alleged that the husband was a borrower of the money or that any contract had been entered into between him and the plaintiff with respect to the amount claimed. An attempt was made in the statement of claim to charge the appellant on an implied liability for the money because at the time it was procured by the wife she represented “that the moneys were needed for the purchase of necessaries of life by her.” It nowhere appears in the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fritz v. HathawaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890
  2. Chestnut Street National Bank v. EllisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
  3. Walker v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1844
  4. Barr v. McGarySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Baldwin v. ElySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. Lederle v. KaplanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  3. Decoster v. Brown (Et Ux.)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  4. Department of Public Assistance v. Hurlbutt, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lycoming County1940
  5. Pletcher v. Pletcher, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Centre County1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API