Legal Opinion
Nikkari v. Jackson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 18, 1948No. 34,642PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Thomas Gallagher, Justice.
On April 30, 1947, a judgment in favor of plaintiff in the sum of $16,179.84 was entered against Dean Jackson and the other defendants, and subsequently, on appeal, the judgment was affirmed by this court. See, Nikkari v. Jackson, 226 Minn. 88, 32 N. W. (2d) 149.
The garnishee, appellant here, pursuant to its obligations under a policy of automobile liability insurance issued by it to defendant Jackson, had conducted the defense of the action on behalf of Jackson. The policy provided that the garnishee as insurer would “pay on behalf of the insured all sums which the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Patterson v. AdanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
- Standard Printing Co. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
- Powers v. WilsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
- Mahr v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Nikkari v. JacksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kooyenga v. Hertz Equipment Rentals, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979
- Gamble-Skogmo, Inc. v. St. Paul Mercury Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Utica Mutual Insurance v. Klein & Son, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1990
- Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. v. Milbank Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Hecht v. James and Farmers Mut. Ins. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1959