Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Barth (In Re Barth)

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. North Dakota

Decided January 10, 1984No. 18-30704PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER

WILLIAM A. HILL, Bankruptcy Judge.

Complaint filed by the Plaintiff in the above-entitled adversary proceeding seeks to have a claim, resulting from legal services given to the Debtor’s former wife, determined non-dischargeable under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(5).

Trial in this matter was held before the Honorable Harold O. Bullís on December 21, 1982, in Bismarck, North Dakota. The parties have consented to this Court rendering its decision on the basis of the record in the matter. After a review of the entire record of pleadings and proceedings, this Court finds the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Brennan, Steil, Ryan, Bastin & MacDougall, S. C. v. Rodriguez (In Re Rodriguez)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1982

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wood v. WoodWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Anderson v. Anderson (In Re Anderson)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1986
  3. Hillius v. Hillius (In Re Hillius Farms)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. North Dakota · 1984
  4. Sateren v. Sateren (In Re Sateren)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. North Dakota · 1995
  5. Cross v. Cross (In Re Cross)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. North Dakota · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API