Dann v. Palmer
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendants, Charles M. Crouse and others, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Oneida Special .Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Onondaga on the 8th day of February, 1912, denying the said defendants’ motion, to have the court pass upon certain proposed findings of fact and law.
1Opinion of the Court
Kruse, J.:
After the trial judge had handed down his opinion, deciding the case in favor of the plaintiffs, but before he had signed his formal decision, the defendants submitted to the trial judge proposed findings of fact and law (as they are designated), upon which the judge declined to pass further than as found in his formal decision, upon the ground that they were not sub*153mitted to him until after he had decided the issues and delivered his opinion to counsel.
After the formal decision had been signed, application was made at Special Term, at which the same judge presided who decided the…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Hydraulic Power Co. v. Pettebone-Cataract Paper Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
- Famous Manufacturing Co. v. GibsonNew York Supreme Court · 1916
- Tausik v. TausikNew York Supreme Court · 1962