Smith v. Griffith
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DAUGHERTY, Chief Judge.
Plaintiffs are school teachers who allege they were wrongfully terminated (or not .renewed) after their first year of employment by Defendants.1 The alleged wrongful termination is based on a violation of Plaintiffs’ due process rights in terminating their employment without notice and hear- , ing. Plaintiffs assert that notwithstanding the rulings in Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 92 S.Ct. 2701, 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972) and Perry v. Sindermann, 408 U.S. 593, 92 S.Ct. 2694, 33 L.Ed.2d 570 (1972) to the effect that non-tenured teachers have no property…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Harris County Commissioners Court v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- King v. Board of Regents, Claremore Junior CollegeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Vinyard v. KingCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
- Vinyard v. KingCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
- Geiger v. Creative Impact IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020