In re the Accounting of Hill
New York Surrogate's Court
1Opinion of the Court
Millard, S.
The will of the above-named decedent was admitted to probate by a decree of this court dated July 15, 1941, and a requested construction of certain provisions thereof *557was reserved for future determination. Upon this application for a judicial settlement of his accounts the executor requests a construction as to the effect of the provisions of paragraphs “ First ”, “ Third ” and “ Eighth ” of the will respectively, by reason of the fact that three of the legatees therein named not only predeceased the testator but died prior to the date of the will. The provisions of said paragraphs…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- In Re the Appraisal Under the Transfer Tax Acts of the Property of KimberlyNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Everitt v. . EverittNew York Court of Appeals · 1864
- Pimel v. . BetjemannNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
- Bliven v. . SeymourNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Trask v. . SturgesNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re the Construction of the Will of MarkowitzNew York Surrogate's Court · 1953