Legal Opinion
Edmond Neal v. Ven Hoover, LLC
District Court, C.D. California
Decided May 24, 2021No. 2:21-cv-01000Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 EDMOND NEAL, ) Case No. CV 21-1000 FMO (PVCx) ) 11 Plaintiff, ) ) 12 v. ) ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT ) PREJUDICE 13 VEN HOOVER, LLC, ) ) 14 Defendant. ) ) 15 16 On February 22, 2021, the court issued its Standing Order Re: ADA Accessibility Cases 17 (see Dkt. 9, Court’s Order of February 22, 2021), which ordered plaintiff Edmond Neal (“plaintiff”) 18 to file a proof of service demonstrating service of the Complaint on all parties “within 93 days of 19 the filing of the case absent a previously approved…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Michael Henry Ferdik v. Joe Bonzelet, SheriffCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- David P. Pagtalunan v. George Galaza, Warden Thomas Maddock, Acting Director, California Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Finn v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
- CPT Corp. v. Daewoo International (America) Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994