Legal Opinion
City of Fresno v. 3M Company, et al.
District Court, E.D. California
Decided January 26, 2026No. 1:25-cv-02057Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CITY OF FRESNO, Case No. 1:25-cv-02057-FRS 11 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO STAY 12 AND STAYING THIS MATTER v. 13 (ECF No. 16) 3M COMPANY, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 On January 13, 2026, Defendant 3M Company (“3M”) filed a motion to stay this matter 17 pending a final decision from the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (“JPML”) on whether 18 to transfer this matter to In re Aqueous Film-Forming Foams (AFFF) Products Liability 19 Litigation (MDL No. 2873) (ECF No. 16.) Concurrently with the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Nken v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Clinton v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Dependable Highway Express, Inc. v. Navigators Ins.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Hoeun Yong v. Immigration and Naturalization Service,opinionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.