Legal Opinion
Agor v. Sessions
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided September 26, 2018No. 17-3231-agUnpublished
1Opinion of the Court
17‐3231‐ag Agor v. Sessions UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURTʹS LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION ʺSUMMARY ORDERʺ). A PARTY CITING A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL. At…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rashid v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Lateef Rabiu v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Luis Sepulveda v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General of the United States, 1Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- Karpova v. SnowCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.