Legal Opinion

Mehlhop v. Pettibone

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 10, 1882Published

APPEAL from the Circuit Court for IVaulcesha County. The defendant, Bronson Pettíbone, being a merchant at Dubuque, Iowa, and indebted to the plaintiff, Mehlhop, in the sum of about $1,500, and having an undivided two-thirds interest in 160 acres of land in Waukesha county, Wisconsin, conveyed-the same to his wife, Eveline, March 29, 1879, and at the same time took from her a deed - of the homestead in Dubuque, on which they then resided, and had resided for many years, and…

Read the full summary

APPEAL from the Circuit Court for IVaulcesha County. The defendant, Bronson Pettíbone, being a merchant at Dubuque, Iowa, and indebted to the plaintiff, Mehlhop, in the sum of about $1,500, and having an undivided two-thirds interest in 160 acres of land in Waukesha county, Wisconsin, conveyed-the same to his wife, Eveline, March 29, 1879, and at the same time took from her a deed - of the homestead in Dubuque, on which they then resided, and had resided for many years, and which was of the value of $2,700. On the 10th of July, 1879, Bronson Pettibone made an assignment of all his property,…

1Opinion

The respondent moved for a rehearing; and the following opinion was filed May 10, 1882:

Cassoday, J.

The statement of facts "in this case was neces- . sarily very brief, and merely indicated the view we took of the evidence in consultation, when both points urged for a rehearing were carefully considered, but perhaps not as clearly stated in the opinion as they should have been. The statement in the opinion that Mrs. Pettibone “ parted with a full and adequate consideration,” was perhaps in part an assumption. There may not have been a “full” consideration; but we thought then, and think now,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pulte v. GellerMichigan Supreme Court · 1882

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API