Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Masada Seisakusho Co. v. Moss

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 22, 1977No. Nos. 38368 and 38369PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEWART, Judge.

This proceeding in prohibition had its origin in two actions, one for wrongful death and another for personal injuries. The actions arise out of the use of a hydraulic jack manufactured by relator. Plaintiffs in the underlying actions sued Kohler City Supply Co. and U. S. Import Distributors, Inc. U. S. Import Distributors, Inc. filed its third party petition against relator and Seiko Trading Co. The relator has its principal place of business in Tokyo, Japan.

Third party plaintiff initiated proceeding to obtain service of third party defendants as provided in United Nations…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Gardner v. HallSupreme Court of Missouri · 1920
  2. Mansur v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1909

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kennon v. Citizens Mutual Insurance-Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. State ex rel. Peterbilt Co. v. LitzMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. Kennon v. Citizens Mutual Insurance-Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Springer v. SpringerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API