Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Middlebrooks

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 4, 1952No. 33967PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtCarlisle, J.

1. Grounds of a motion for a new trial which are not argued orally, or in the brief of the plaintiff in error, nor generally insisted upon, are treated as abandoned and will not be determined by this court. Western & Atlantic Railroad v. Hughes, 84 Ga. App. 511, 518 (66 S. E. 2d, 382).

2. Where, in the general portions of the court’s charge, the jury is instructed: “In determining where the preponderance of evidence lies, you may consider all the facts and circumstances of the case, the witnesses’ manner of testifying, their intelligence, their means and opportunity for knowing the facts to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Andrews v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  2. New York Life Insurance v. JenningsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
  3. Hart v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
  4. Moore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
  5. Western & Atlantic Railroad v. HughesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Nix v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API