Legal Opinion

Tax Review Board v. Weiner

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 18, 1960No. Appeal, 359PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Musmanno,

The appellant in this case, Abraham Weiner, who presented and argued his case in personam, is a stickler for his rights, as, of course, he has the right to be, whether he knows or not w;hat they are. He complains that the City of Philadelphia did not have the right to charge him in the amount of $189.10 (or, presumably, in any amount), for excess water and sewer services rendered to his premises at 1509 N. 13th Street, for the period from January 28, 1957 to May 1, 1958. He complains that the city used an invalid ordinance in drafting the charge, it delayed in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gericke v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  2. Commonwealth v. BechtelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  3. Monaghan v. City of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1955

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Grant v. GAF Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Sanft v. Borough of West GroveCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Upper Gwynedd Township Authority v. RothCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Elizabeth Tp. v. MUN. AUTH. OF McKEESPORTSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. United States v. Oswald & Hess Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1964

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API