Legal Opinion

State v. Mitchell

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided January 16, 1978No. 7753PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum Opinion

Defendants were convicted in Durham District Court of attempted theft in violation of RSA 687:3. There is no transcript of the testimony. After several procedural events not material to the issue before us, the District Court (Nadeau, J.) denied the defendants’ motion to certify to this court, in advance of an appeal de novo to the superior court, the question whether the evidence was sufficient to support the guilty verdict. Defendants thereafter filed *2this petition for a writ of certiorari in this court claiming an abuse of discretion on the part of the Durham District…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. DoyleSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
  2. State v. VarneySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hilco Property v. U.S.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API