Taylor v. Dixon
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtWiNBORNE, C. J.
This is the sole question presented on this appeal: When a defendant in a proceeding under the North Carolina Workmen’s Compensation Act sets up a specific defense, .as in the present case may the Industrial Commission fail or refuse to make specific findings of fact in respect thereto in the light of the evidence offered. The answer is “No.”
Here the defendant contends plaintiff was employed to operate a chain saw and, though forbidden to do so, undertook to operate a tractor.
In this connection, “if”, as stated in Larson’s Workmen’s Compensation Law Vol. 1, p. 463, “the unrelated job is…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- McGill v. Town of LumbertonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- Morrow v. . Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
3Cited by9 opinions
- In Matter of RogersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Hoyle v. Isenhour Brick & Tile Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- Hensley v. Caswell Action Committee, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Spratt v. Duke Power Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
- Parker v. Burlington Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.