Legal Opinion
Jackson v. Hochadel Roofing Co.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided August 10, 2001No. 1D00-2316PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
794 So.2d 668 (2001)
James JACKSON, Appellant,
v.
HOCHADEL ROOFING CO. and Claims Center, Appellees.
No. 1D00-2316.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
August 10, 2001.
Rehearing Denied September 14, 2001.
Appellant, pro se.
Larry Cangro, Esquire of Matusek, McKnight, Poluse & Cangro, P.A., St. Petersburg, for Appellees.
BENTON, J.
James Jackson, a permanently, totally disabled worker, appeals the compensation order determining his indemnity benefits. He contends that the amount is too low because the social security offset is too high. Specifically, he argues that the judge of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Barragan v. City of MiamiSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
- Escambia County Sheriff's Dept. v. GriceSupreme Court of Florida · 1997
- City of Hollywood v. LombardiSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
- Hunt v. StrattonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
- DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN & FAM. v. MonroeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Orange County Fire Rescue v. AntonelliDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
- Boyd v. White Whale RestaurantDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
- Raymond James & Associates v. SmithDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003