Legal Opinion · Dissent

In Re Estate of McFarland

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided July 7, 2005No. E2003-01833-SC-R9-CVPublished

1Dissent

FRANK F. DROWOTA, III, C.J.,

dissenting.

I respectfully dissent. The question in this case is whether, when a will includes a residuary clause with two or more beneficiaries, a lapsed residuary gift is to be distributed among surviving residuary beneficiaries or among the testator’s intestate heirs. The majority reaffirms Ford v. Ford, 31 Tenn. 431, 435 (1852), which holds that a lapsed residuary gift passes via intestate succession. I would overrule Ford and hold that where the residue of a will is devised to two or more persons and the share of one fails, that share passes to the other…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Oliver v. WellsNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  2. Gray's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
  3. In Re Estate of VincentTennessee Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Corbett v. SkaggsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922
  5. Metropolitan Government of Nashville v. PoeTennessee Supreme Court · 1964

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API