Legal Opinion

Henderson v. Stroup

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 18, 1940No. 563PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By LEMERT, J.

This is an action brought by plaintiff asking to recover compensation for services rendered to defendant’s decedent. The case was tried to a jury and a verdict rendered in favor of the plaintiff. It is the contention of the defendant, appellant, that in the trial of the above cause there is error in this, to-wit:

1. That the plaintiff had no right to call for cross-examination the nominal defendant, Mrs. Stroup.

2. That there was no place in the case for any testimony touching the question of a will made and destroyed unless such fact was known to the plaintiff and acted…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gioffre v. SimakisOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Gorey v. Gregg, Exr.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1945
  3. Stupp v. LearOhio Court of Appeals · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API