Hawk v. Bavarian Motor Works
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
The issue in this case is whether, in all circumstances, the failure to file a written denial of a pleading to which a response is required, under Rule 8 (d), ARCP, admits the allegations of that pleading where the issues tried are embraced in prior pleadings that were responded to in writing.
Under the facts in this case we find defendants' failure to file written denial of plaintiff's added count to his complaint, where the issues presented by such were embraced in other counts which had previously been responded to in writing, did not entitle plaintiff to a directed verdict on the added…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lester Stacy v. The Aetna Casualty & Surety CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- McDuffie v. HooperSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
- Rafield v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
- Weitnauer Trading Company Ltd. v. Morton L. AnnisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Amalgamated Meat Cutters & Butcher Workmen of North America v. Knouse Foods Cooperative, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1966
3Cited by20 opinions
- B & M HOMES, INC. v. HoganSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
- Jones v. LeFloreCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1982
- INTERNATIONAL REHAB. ASSOCIATES v. AdamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
- Scrushy v. TuckerSupreme Court of Alabama · 2011
- AMMON EX REL. WAUSAU INS. v. Tesker Mfg. Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2002
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.