Simon v. Day & Kirksey
Texas Supreme Court
Error from Limestone. Tried below before Hon. Rueus Hardy. No statement is necessary.
1Opinion of the Court
HENRY, Associate Justice.
— The appellees, claiming to own an undivided one-half of the land, brought two suits of trespass to try title and for partition. J. B. Reilly was the sole defendant in the first one, which was for 114 acres of land. The second one was against Fannie, Edward, Allie, and Bennie Persons, as sole .defendants, and was for a separate tract containing 396 acres.
Both suits were filed on the same day. The defendants in each answered, setting up substantially the same defenses, after which the suits were, without objection, consolidated. Both petitions charged that the lands…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Empire Gas & Fuel Co. v. NobleTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
- Twichell v. AskewCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
- Wood v. LoveCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
- Holmes v. KleinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
- Ruby v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.