Legal Opinion

Rohrbough, Inc. v. Commissioner of Revenue

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 20, 1982PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.

In 1971, George I. Rohrbough (Rohrbough) sold real estate in Roston at a substantial capital gain. The sales price was to be paid in instalments over a period of six years, pursuant to notes, and the transaction qualified under § 453 of the Internal Revenue Code (I.R.C.) (26 U.S.C. § 453 [1976]) for treatment as an instalment sale. Rohrbough elected to report the gain as an instalment sale for Federal income tax purposes, but, for State income tax purposes (G. L. c. 62, § 63 [e]), he elected to report the gain on his 1971 individual tax return and to pay the tax on the entire gain. In…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. DeBlois v. Commissioner of Corporations & TaxationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  2. Old Colony Trust Co. v. Commissioner of Corporations & TaxationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
  3. New England Mutual Life Insurance v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
  4. Dogon v. State Tax CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Northeast Petroleum Corp. v. Commissioner of RevenueMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  2. Commissioner of Revenue v. ShafnerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
  3. Commissioner of Revenue v. Northeast Petroleum Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
  4. FMR Corp. v. Commissioner of RevenueMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
  5. General Mills, Inc. v. Commissioner of RevenueMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API