Gallovitch v. Wylly
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtMacIntybe, J.
It is a well-recognized rule of law that the estate of a decedent can not be held responsible in an action ex delicto for the misfeasance or nonfeasance of an executor or administrator. Parker v. Barlow, 93 Ga. 700 (21 S. E. 213); Anderson v. Foster, 105 Ga. 563 (32 S. E. 373); Carr v. Tate, 107 Ga. 237 (33 S. E. 47); Bank of Newton County v. American Bonding Co., 141 Ga. 326 (80 S. E. 1003, 50 L. R. A. (N. S.) 1089); Handley v. Pendleton, 9 Ga. App. 268 (70 S. E. 1115); Calloway v. Livingston, 28 Ga. App. 453 (111 S. E. 742); Evans v. Dickey, 50 Ga. App. 127 (177 S. E. 87). . Therefore a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Evans v. DickeyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
- Bank of Newton County v. American Bonding Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1914
- Anderson v. FosterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
- Callaway v. LivingstonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922
- Carr v. TateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ernest G. Beaudry Inc. v. FreemanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1946
- Fife v. RichardsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
- Watson v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940