Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Holmes v. Director, Department of Workforce Services

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided May 20, 2015No. E-14-956Published

1ConcurrencePhillip T. Whiteaker, Judge

I agree with the majority that substantial evidence supports the Arkansas Board of Review’s decision. I write separately, however, to express concern about the adversarial tone of the questioning by the hearing officer for the Arkansas Appeal Tribunal.

Under Arkansas Code Annotated section 11 — 10—526(a)(1) (Repl. 2012), the Appeal Tribunal is not bound by common law or statutory rules of evidence or by technical rules of procedure, but any hearing or appeal before the tribunal shall be conducted in such manner as to ascertain the substantial rights of the parties. Moreover, the Arkansas Code…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Stagecoach Motel v. KrauseCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1980
  2. Beeson v. LandcoastCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API