Legal Opinion

State v. Proctor

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 17, 1988No. 86-09606; CA A46537Published

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

Defendant was convicted of perjury. ORS 162.065.1 He assigns as error the trial court’s denial of his motion for acquittal on the grounds that (1) the release officer who administered the oath under which he allegedly made a false statement did not have authority to administer oaths and (2), in any event, he did not make a false statement on his security release questionnaire. We affirm.

On the evening of October 24, 1986, defendant was arrested on a warrant for failure to appear on a driving while suspended charge and was taken to the Lane County Jail. He had been drinking heavily throughout…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. CraigOregon Supreme Court · 1919
  2. State v. FlamerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  3. State v. DuncanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API