Wright v. Coules
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtGray, P. J.
This is an action for injury to the1 plaintiff’s hotel business alleged to have been caused by publications made by defendants in several newspapers. A demurrer to the amended complaint as amended was sustained and the appeal from the judgment is by plaintiff.
The questions presented relate to the sufficiency of the complaint. The amended complaint as amended purports to set out three several and distinct causes of action. In the first cause of action it is alleged in substance that plaintiff was engaged in the business of an innkeeper at the Hotel Arcadia in Santa Monica, in the county of Los…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Erlich v. EtnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Miller Insurance Agency v. Home Fire & Marine InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1935
- Ellsworth v. Martindale-Hubbell Law Directory, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1938