Legal Opinion

United States v. Bealey

United States Court of International Trade

Decided September 17, 1990No. Court No. 86-03-00348Published

1Opinion of the Court

DiCarlo, Judge:

The government moves for summary judgment for liquidated damages plus prejudgment and postjudgment interest for breach of an immediate delivery and consumption entry bond. Defendant Terry L. Bealey, the principal, opposes the motion arguing there are material issues of fact. Bealey and the Insurance Company of North America (ICNA), the surety, also oppose the government’s request for an award of prejudgment interest. ICNA cross moves for summary judgment against Bealey for indemnification and attorneys’ fees and expenses.

The Court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1582(2) and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. United States v. Imperial Food Imports, and American Motorists Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  3. Blum v. William Goldman Theatres, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
  4. United States v. GoodmanUnited States Court of International Trade · 1983
  5. Morgan Guaranty Trust Co. of New York v. Republic of PalauDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API