Legal Opinion

Boock v. Acme Markets, Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 26, 1943PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The facts are stated in the opinion by EAGEN, J., of the court below, in part, as follows:

This is an action in trespass which by agreement was tried before EAGEN, J., without a jury. The Court makes the following findings of fact:

1. The defendant corporation is in the retail food business and for that purpose owns, maintains and operates a self-service store or market, at 901 Pittston Avenue, Scranton, Penna., to which during business hours the general public is invited.

2. That on March 29th, 1941, at or about the hour of 6:30 p. m., the plaintiff, Elsie J. Boock, entered said store through a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bloomer v. SnellenburgSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
  2. Rogers v. Max Azen, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  3. Bilger v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Brancato v. Kroger Co., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Bream v. BergerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  3. Frelick v. Homeopathic Hospital Ass'n of DelawareSuperior Court of Delaware · 1959
  4. Druding v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  5. Brewster v. MorroneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API