Conkle Admr., Etc. v. Laughlin
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Linn, J.,
Plaintiff, administrator of Mary J. Laughlin, deceased, brought assumpsit to enforce the personal obligation imposed on defendant Robert L. Laughlin, by the will of Thomas Laughlin, deceased, in favor of decedent’s widow, Mary J. Laughlin, for the period from February 1,1917, to January 15,1918, the time of her death. The will provides: “Second: I give, devise and bequeath to my beloved wife, Mary J. Laughlin, the house and lot in which I now reside, during her lifetime and at her decease to go to Robert L. Laughlin,, and to be his absolutely and to hold him and his heirs…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Dunbar v. DunbarSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Stradley v. Bath Portland Cement Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
- Steele's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1864
- Walters's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
- Steele v. WalterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lapat Co. v. Northern Metal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Walton's EstatePennsylvania Orphans' Court, Philadelphia County · 1924