Legal Opinion

Conkle Admr., Etc. v. Laughlin

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 22, 1924No. Appeal, 146PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Linn, J.,

Plaintiff, administrator of Mary J. Laughlin, deceased, brought assumpsit to enforce the personal obligation imposed on defendant Robert L. Laughlin, by the will of Thomas Laughlin, deceased, in favor of decedent’s widow, Mary J. Laughlin, for the period from February 1,1917, to January 15,1918, the time of her death. The will provides: “Second: I give, devise and bequeath to my beloved wife, Mary J. Laughlin, the house and lot in which I now reside, during her lifetime and at her decease to go to Robert L. Laughlin,, and to be his absolutely and to hold him and his heirs…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Dunbar v. DunbarSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. Stradley v. Bath Portland Cement Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
  3. Steele's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1864
  4. Walters's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
  5. Steele v. WalterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lapat Co. v. Northern Metal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. Walton's EstatePennsylvania Orphans' Court, Philadelphia County · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API