Legal Opinion

Grubb v. Lashus

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 29, 1913No. 2421PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Second District; Hon. J. A. Howell, Judge. Action by C. J. Grubb against George W. Lashus. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtFeign, J.

This was an action in claim and delivery to recover possession of a stallion of the alleged value of $540, which, it is alleged, was unlawfully detained from respondent by appellant after demand therefor had been duly made upon the latter.

The respondent’s right to possession is based upon a chattel mortgage, which he alleged was executed, delivered, filed, and recorded as provided by the statutes of this state. The appellant denied respondent’s right to possession and set up a counterclaim, in which he claimed the right to the possession of said stallion by reason of an agister’s lien, which…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Case v. AllenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1878
  2. Howes v. NewcombMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
  3. Wichita & Western Railroad v. KuhnSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
  4. National Bank of Commerce v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
  5. Smith v. StevensSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. First National Bank of Mountain View v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. First National Bank v. SilvaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API