Legal Opinion
Triggiana v. Gens
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided September 13, 1973No. Patent Appeal No. 8949PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BALDWIN, Judge.
This appeal is from that part of the decision of the Board of Patent Interferences that awarded priority of invention as to counts 3 and 4 of interference No. 96,136 to the appellee Gens.1 Trig-giana is involved through his application serial No. 554,345, filed June 1, 1966. Gens, the junior party, is involved *1382through application serial No. 578,428, filed September 8,1966.
The Invention
The invention is described as follows in appellant’s brief:
The invention is concerned with mi-crospheres which consist essentially of uranium mononitride and are useful as nuclear reactor fuels.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Dreyfus v. LilienfeldCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
- Jany Renz, Jean Pierre Bourquin, Guido Gamboni and Gustav Schwarb v. Robert Michel Jacob and Gilbert Louis RegnierCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
3Cited by3 opinions
- Knorr v. PearsonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1982
- Meitzner v. MindickCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1977
- Tong Seae Industrial Co. v. International Trade CommissionCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1980