Legal Opinion

State v. Wika

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 2, 1991No. 16927PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORGAN, Justice.

Philip P. Wika (Wika) appeals from a judgment of conviction for sexual contact with a .child under the age of 16 and the denial of his motion to withdraw his nolo contendere plea to the same charge. We affirm.

FACTS

On October 13, 1988, Wika was charged in an indictment with two counts of sexual contact with a child under the age of 16 (SDCL 22-22-7 1) and one count of first degree rape in violation of SDCL 22-22-1(4)2 (sexual penetration with person less *632than ten years of age). The charges were based upon allegations concerning Wika’s conduct with his two minor granddaughters.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Joseph F. Cuthrell v. Director, Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1973
  2. Luna v. SolemSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Joseph George, Jr. v. Charles Black, Warden, Nebraska State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
  4. Gregory v. SolemSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Application of GarritsenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Davi v. ClassSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. TimperleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. NikolaevSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State v. RichardsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State v. RobinsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API