Legal Opinion
Lane v. Amsted Industries, Inc.
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided November 14, 1989No. WD 40991PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SHANGLER, Presiding Judge.
The plaintiff Florence Lane appeals from a judgment entered on a jury verdict on her claim for personal injury from a defective automatic drill press manufactured by the defendant Amsted Industries, Inc. and distributed by the defendant Bossert Company-
The plaintiff was employed by Lyons Die Casting as a drill operator at the time of the occurrence of injury. The machine was a Deka 712, a multi-purpose press that functioned to drill holes by means of rotating spindles used in different patterns according to the set up. The upper part of the machine, from which the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Nesselrode v. Executive Beechcraft, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1986
- Elmore v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1984
- Fischer v. Johns-Manville Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
- Lippard v. Houdaille Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1986
- Maxey v. Freightliner Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Leonard DRABIK, Appellee, v. STANLEY-BOSTITCH, INC., Defendant, Bostitch, a Division of Textron, Inc., AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
- Hoffman Management Corp. v. S.L.C. of North America, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1990
- Stucker v. ChitwoodMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
- Clayton Center Associates v. W.R. Grace & Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1993
- Sutherland v. Elpower Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.