Legal Opinion

In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 22, 2008PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Respondent, who was admitted to practice by this Court in 1988, was suspended by this Court’s order dated June 7, 1999 for failure to comply with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a (262 AD2d 702 [1999]).

Respondent now requests reinstatement on the ground that she has complied with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a and the rules of the Chief Administrator of the Courts (see 22 NYCRR part 118). Petitioner does not object to respondent’s application.

Respondent’s application is granted and she is ordered reinstated, effective immediately.

M…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-aAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re VellekampAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API