Wright v. Ryland

Jones, J.,

dissented and delivered the following opinion :

For the reasons which are given in the following expression of my views I have felt constrained to dissent, though with *658great respect, from the conclusions of the Court in this case. Though the facts of the case appear in the opinion of the Court it will conduce perhaps to a better understanding of the views I shall here submit, to accompany them with a particular statement of the facts.

On the 29th of June, 1887, Samuel P. Ryland and Chauncy Brooks, partners, obtained in the Baltimore City Court a judgment for $457.16, with interest and…