Legal Opinion

Rutland v. City of Dublin

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 11, 1934No. 24382PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtG-uerry, J.

It is well settled that this court, in determining whether or not the action of the superior court in overruling the certiorari was correct, can look only to the answer of the magistrate before whom the defendant was tried; and where his answer does not disclose that there was a conviction of the defendant,—that is, that a final judgment was rendered against him,—there is nothing for this court or the superior court to consider. Brown v. Gainesville, 125 Ga. 238 (53 S. E. 1002); Landrum v. Moss, 1 Ga. App. 216 (57 S. E. 965); Jessey v. Dean, 122 Ga. 371 (50 S. E. 139); Southern Ry. Co. v.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Landrum v. MossCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  2. Brown v. City of GainesvilleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  3. Jessey v. DeanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  4. Humphries v. NalleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1914
  5. Southern Railway Co. v. GraceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. NationsBank, NA (South) v. TuckerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  2. Taylor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
  3. Taylor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API