Legal Opinion

Missouri-Lincoln Trust Co. v. Long

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 14, 1911No. 1032PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error from Grady County Court; N. M. Williams, Judge. Action by the Missouri-Lincoln Trust Company against A. E. Long. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtKane, J.

This was an action upon a promissory note, executed in the Indian Territory prior to statehood, commenced by the plaintiff in error, plaintiff below, against the defendant in error, defendant below. There was judgment for the defendant, to reverse which this proceeding in error was commenced. It was agreed between counsel in the court below that, if the note sued upon was held to be a negotiable instrument, judgment should be entered for the plaintiff for the amount sued for; and, if it was held to be non-negotiable, judgment was to be entered for the defendant. The note is in words and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. National Bank of Commerce v. KenneyTexas Supreme Court · 1904
  2. City National Bank v. Goodloe-McClelland Commission Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1902
  3. Farmer v. Bank of GraettingerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  4. Cudahy Packing Co. v. State Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
  5. First National Bank v. ButteryNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1908

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. LavenderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  2. Navajo County Bank v. DolsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  3. City Nat. Bank v. KellySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. First National Bank v. BaldwinNebraska Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Anaheim National Bank v. DolphCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API