Legal Opinion

Matthews v. Matthews-Baker

Nebraska Court of Appeals

Decided August 30, 2005No. A-04-022PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cassel, Judge.

INTRODUCTION

Melissa Matthews appeals from an order construing a holographic will and determining that part of the estate passes pursuant to intestacy. The sole devise of the will stated: “I want Melissa to get all proceeds from the money that is left and from all contents in the house.” The county court determined that the will did not dispose of the decedent’s interest in real estate being purchased under contract and occupied as the decedent’s personal residence. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

No appeal was taken from an earlier order admitting the decedent’s holographic will to formal…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Evans v. BoneyNebraska Supreme Court · 1942
  2. In Re Estate of WalkerNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
  3. In Re Estate of MecelloNebraska Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Scriven v. ScrivenNebraska Supreme Court · 1951
  5. In Re Estate of CorriganNebraska Supreme Court · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of MouselNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Lovorn v. Brethouwer (In Re Estate of Tiedeman)Nebraska Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. Seemann v. SeemannNebraska Supreme Court · 2025
  4. In re Estate of TiedemanNebraska Court of Appeals · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API