Baxter v. Hart

Searls, C.

This action was brought to recover three hundred and ninety-one dollars and ninety-three cents for services performed hy plaintiff in threshing wheat and barley for defendant.

The complaint was not verified, and the answer was a general denial of its allegations.

The cause was tried hy the court, written findings filed, and judgment rendered thereon as prayed for in the complaint.

The appeal is from the final judgment, was taken within sixty days after rendition of iudgment, and is supported hy a bill of exceptions.

The testimony was conflicting. There was testimony tending to show the…