Legal Opinion

Dowling v. Chicago Options Associates, Inc.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 31, 2006No. 1-05-1426PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE GARCIA

delivered the opinion of the court:

This appeal comes to us from supplementary proceedings instituted by the plaintiff, Brian Dowling, against DLA Piper, Rudnick, Gray, Cary (US), LLP (Piper Rudnick). Dowling instituted the supplementary proceedings to enforce judgments entered against Piper Rudnick’s client, Michael Davis, which totaled $817,830.45. On appeal, Piper Rudnick argues that the circuit court exceeded its authority when it ordered Piper Rudnick to turn over the retainer funds deposited by Davis in anticipation of legal services.

BACKGROUND

In May and October…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Buckner v. CauseyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  2. Gonzalez v. Profile Sanding Equipment, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2002
  3. Northwest Diversified, Inc. v. MauerAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
  4. Business Service Bureau, Inc. v. MartinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  5. Itasca Bank & Trust Co. v. Thorleif Larsen & Son, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2004

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dowling v. Chicago Options Associates, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Workforce Solutions v. Urban Services of America, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2012
  3. Dowling v. Chicago Options Associates, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2006
  4. Dowling v. Chicago Options Associates, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Dowling v. Chicago Options Associates, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API