Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Lambert

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 18, 2005No. 427 CAPPublishedCited by 211 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice CASTILLE.

Appellant James Lambert appeals from the order of the Court of Common Pleas dismissing his second petition for relief filed pursuant to the Post Conviction Relief Act (“PCRA”), 42 Pa.C.S. § 9541 et seq. For the reasons set forth below, we find that appellant is not entitled to relief and, accordingly, we affirm the order of the PCRA court.

On April 25, 1984, appellant was convicted of first degree murder, robbery, conspiracy, and related offenses in connection with the murders of two patrons during a robbery of a bar in Philadelphia. 1 Following a penalty-phase hearing,…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Strickler v. GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by211 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BennettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. Commonwealth v. SpotzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  3. Commonwealth v. ChmielSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  4. Commonwealth v. ChesterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  5. Commonwealth v. Abu-JamalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008

206 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API