Legal Opinion · Dissent

In re Adoption of T.M.M.H. – Per Curiam

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 11, 2018No. 115309Published

1DissentJohnson, J.

I dissent from the majority's conclusion that a grandmother, who has had custody of her grandchild from a tender age pursuant to both a co-parenting agreement with the child's sole-surviving biological parent and an order from a district court, does not have standing to participate in a stepparent adoption proceeding. While the majority disposes of the case by attacking the lawyering skills of Grandmother's attorney, I submit that we know enough from the record to discern that Grandmother has a legitimate claim to being an interested person in these proceedings. Accordingly, we should reverse…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mid-Continent Specialists, Inc. v. Capital Homes, L.C.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2005
  2. Frazier v. GoudschaalSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
  3. In re the Marriage of NelsonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API