Legal Opinion

Rominiecki v. McIntyre Livestock Corp.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided August 17, 1981No. 80SA129PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOHR, Justice.

Albín S. D. Rominiecki and Jean D. Sylvester Rominiecki (applicants) appeal from a judgment of the water court denying their application for an alternate point of diversion for two direct-flow water rights utilized to irrigate high mountain meadows owned by the applicants and located above the Paonia Reservoir in Gunnison County, Colorado. The trial court concluded that to grant the request would accomplish an impermissible substitution of one source of supply for another with resulting injury to others. Because it appears that the application can be granted without such injury…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Weibert v. Rothe Bros., Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1980
  2. Peterson v. Ground Water CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978
  3. Fort Lyon Canal Co. v. ChewSupreme Court of Colorado · 1905
  4. Pulaski Irrigating Ditch Co. v. City of TrinidadSupreme Court of Colorado · 1922
  5. Trinchera Ranch Co. v. Trinchera Irrigation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1928

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Aspen Wilderness Workshop, Inc. v. Colorado Water Conservation BoardSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  2. City of Thornton v. Bijou Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  3. Santa Fe Trail Ranches Property Owners Ass'n v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
  4. Board of County Commissioners of Arapahoe v. United StatesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  5. Williams v. Midway Ranches Property Owners Ass'nSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API