Legal Opinion

People v. Holmes

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 13, 1992No. 1-88-3713PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lorenz

Defendant Marion Holmes and codefendant William Franklin were tried separately and convicted of the murder of Elgin Evans. The State’s key witness at both trials, Ulric Williams, had been present during the murder. In order to protect the credibility of Williams’ testimony at Holmes’ trial, the State characterized Williams as an innocent bystander to the murder and further denied that Williams’ testimony was in any way motivated by an expectation for prosecutorial leniency concerning his involvement in the murder. Holmes filed this appeal arguing that, in light of the evidence in the record,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. People v. FranklinIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
  4. People v. TerryIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  5. People v. HolmesIllinois Supreme Court · 1990

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. PecoraroIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
  2. People v. FranklinIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
  3. People v. DunnAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
  4. People v. SpainAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996
  5. United States Ex Rel. Franklin v. GilmoreDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API