Legal Opinion
Young v. Malcolm
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided June 2, 1983No. Civ. 80-2963PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BIUNNO, Senior District Judge.
The claims remaining in this case are by Mr. & Mrs. Young against Dr. Braun and Dr. Malcolm for alleged medical malpractice. There has also been a claim, from the time the complaint was filed, against Holy Name Hospital and several fictitious persons described as its employees.
The claims against Dr. Braun, a pathologist at Holy Name, and Dr. Malcolm, an internist specializing in hematology, are alleged on the basis of failure to adhere to medically accepted standards applicable to each of their fields. The claims against Holy Name and its fictitiously…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. KrogerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Moor v. County of AlamedaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Snyder v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Zahn v. International Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Marsella v. Monmouth Medical CenterNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
- Garcia v. GalloDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1987