Legal Opinion

JOHN DA GROSA SMITH v. RYAN MILLSAP

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 7, 2022No. A22A0429Published

1Opinion of the Court

FOURTH DIVISION DILLARD, P. J., MERCIER and MARKLE, JJ. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. https://www.gaappeals.us/rules June 7, 2022 In the Court of Appeals of Georgia A22A0429. SMITH et al. v. MILLSAP et al. MARKLE, Judge. Attorney John Da Grosa Smith represented Ryan Millsap in a business dispute between Millsap and his former partner, James Schulz. While that case was still pending, Smith became concerned that he would not be fully compensated for his work, and he filed…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. RisjordSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Richardson-Merrell Inc. v. Koller Ex Rel. KollerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Rivera v. WashingtonSupreme Court of Georgia · 2016
  5. Expedia, Inc. v. City of ColumbusCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API