Hempstead Bottling Works Corp. v. Patterson
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
In a proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Act, respondents, constituting the Town Board of the Town of Hemp-stead, appeal from an order, which annulled its determination denying petitioner’s application for a zoning “ variance.” The order appealed from remitted the proceeding to the said board for further consideration and determination. Appeal dismissed, with $10 costs and disbursements. The order is not appeal-able. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 1304; Matter of Bly v. Witmer, 263 App. Div. 1069; Matter of Francisco v. O’Connell, 274 App. Div. 796.) Present — Nolan, P. J., Wenzel,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Francisco v. O'ConnellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
- Bly v. WitmerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
3Cited by2 opinions
- North American Holding Corp. v. MurdockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958
- Soros v. Board of AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965