Legal Opinion

Francis v. Franklin

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 29, 1985No. 83-1590PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

471 U.S. 307 (1985)

FRANCIS, WARDEN

v.

FRANKLIN

No. 83-1590.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argued November 28, 1984

Decided April 29, 1985

CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

Susan V. Boleyn, Assistant Attorney General of Georgia, argued the cause for petitioner. With her on the brief were Michael J. Bowers, Attorney General, James P. Googe, Jr., Executive Assistant Attorney General, Marion O. Gordon, First Assistant Attorney General, and William B. Hill, Jr., Senior Assistant Attorney General.

Ronald J. Tabak argued the cause for respondent. With him on the…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Brennan; Dissent · Powell; Dissent · Rehnquist.

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Wainwright v. WittSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Willard Hall v. F. HawsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  2. Tracy Petrocelli v. Renee BakerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  3. (HC) Anthony L. Zeigler v. FoxDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
  4. (HC) Rodriguez v. LizzaragaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
  5. (HC) Torres v. MontgomeryDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API